TYPE · IEPL
IEPL
IEPL focuses on a more controllable cross-border transmission path. After entering from the access side, data travels through dedicated links or relatively fixed transport resources to the exit, reducing repeated detours across public networks. Its value is not a momentary peak shown on a page, but a more predictable path over long sessions and better continuity during network fluctuations.
These routes suit video calls, remote desktops, sustained uploads, collaborative documents and AI tools that need to stay signed in for extended periods. They typically require greater route-management and maintenance resources, so reserve them for tasks that are more sensitive to continuity. For simply opening webpages, reading documents or running short queries, a dedicated route is not always necessary.
Best for · Long sessions / interactive tasks / sustained transfers
TYPE · RELAY
Relay routes
A relay route first connects to a nearby access point, which then forwards traffic to an exit in the target region. This separates local access from the remote exit into two stages, helping avoid unstable sections of the public network and making distant exits easier to use. The relay layer is part of the path, so maintenance focuses on the combination of entry selection, forwarding path and exit status.
Relay routes suit everyday browsing, streaming, code repositories, cloud consoles and most AI tools. They offer a balanced mix of coverage and operating cost, making them a versatile starting point when a dedicated route is not specifically needed. If a region offers multiple relay entries, test them individually for the current task and keep the most stable one as your regular route.
Best for · Everyday access / regional content / general tasks
TYPE · DIRECT
Direct routes
A direct route connects the client straight to an exit in the target region without an additional relay layer. Its structure is simple, with fewer forwarding steps, and it works well when the local network already has a good connection to the target exit. Direct performance depends more heavily on the user’s network, carrier routing and the public path between the user and the target data center, so results may vary significantly across network environments.
These routes suit light browsing, backup exits, region-specific checks and users who prefer a particular path structure. Direct routes generally have a simpler cost structure, but that does not mean they outperform relay or dedicated routes on every network. If the connection drops frequently, switch to a relay in the same region instead of repeatedly reconnecting to the same exit.
Best for · Light tasks / backup exits / regional checks
A route name is not a speed guarantee
IEPL, relay and direct describe path structure. The actual experience is also affected by the local network, carrier exit, target service data center, connection time and client status. Test with your own real tasks when choosing a route rather than judging solely by its type name.
Nearby does not always mean a shorter path
Geographic distance is only a reference. Public networks may pass through additional cities or exchange points, and a nearby exit may still take a detour. If the target service has a regional requirement, match the region first; otherwise compare different access methods within the same region.
Cost differences come from path resources
Dedicated routes require more controlled transport resources, relay routes require forwarding between entry and exit, and direct routes have a relatively simple structure. You do not need to use the most resource-intensive path at all times; reserve more stable routes for more important, sustained tasks.